Arizona Population Health Policy Initiative

April 13, 2012

The Division of Public Health Preventive Services is moving forward with an exciting new initiative to improve health outcomes for Arizonans. Through a new partnership with Arizona’s local county health departments, the Division is looking at ways in which it can improve health outcomes for Arizonans by advancing evidence-based strategies which address community design, school health, worksite wellness, clinical care, and accessibility to nutritious food.  Recognized as a Winnable Battle within the ADHS Strategic Plan, the Population Health Policy Initiative (PHPI) is Arizona Population Health Policy Initiative (PHPI) is Arizona’s version of both the CDC Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) and Community Transformation Grant (CTG). 

PHPI officially began on April 1st and is intended to continue for the next three years.  Funding for PHPI is made possible through state (tobacco tax & lottery) as well as federal (Title V Funding for Children with Special Health Needs). As this initiative advances, additional information will be shared.

AZ_Health_Policy_IGA


SAVE THE DATE: Health Literacy Training May 4, Casa Grande

April 9, 2012

Join us for a meeting of the Arizona Health Literacy Coalition and get to know other professionals with an interest in health literacy. The meeting will begin with training conducted by Marti Lindsey, PhD., University of Arizona, and Andrew Pleasant, Ph.D., Canyon Ranch Institute, on health literacy principles and techniques. There will be an opportunity to engage in discussions and exercises.

The second half of the morning will include a review of the National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy in light of our needs in Arizona. We hope to develop a statewide plan to raise the knowledge and practice levels of professionals about health literacy issues and identify potential next steps and activities for Arizona.

Who should attend? Medical and public health professionals and others from education, libraries, social services and anyone with an interest in public health. Students are welcome.

Meeting details: Friday, May 4, 2012, from 9:00 am to 12:30 pm, in Casa Grande. For more information, visit www.azhealthliteracy.org .

AHLC_May4_flyer

 


Breathing Easy

March 30, 2012

HHS HealthBeat (March 30, 2012)

Breathing easy 

More than 12 million Americans have been diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD. If you have COPD, you might experience constant coughing, excessive phlegm build up, and shortness of breath during normal activities.

Smoking is the most common cause of COPD. Air pollutants and respiratory problems also put you at risk.  Dr. Anne Wheaton is an epidemiologist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The most important thing is not to smoke. But if you are a smoker, smoking cessation—quitting smoking—is very important. Also, you can reduce exposure to air pollutants such as second hand smoke. And people who are exposed to dust, chemicals, or fumes at work should always use the proper protective equipment.” (14 seconds)

 Listen to Tip

Breathing easy

03/30/2012 01:01 AM EDT


HHS HealthBeat: Oranges and strokes

March 29, 2012
 
HHS HealthBeat (March 29, 2012)
Oranges and strokes
 
People generally should eat more fruits and vegetables, and one study suggests a possible reason to have citrus on that menu. In collaboration with Harvard University, Aedin Cassidy at the University of East Anglia in England examined data on the risk of stroke in almost 70,000 U.S. nurses. She looked at what the women ate, especially forms of flavonoids, found in plants:

“Citrus flavonoids, called flavanones, seemed to be associated with a reduction in risk. So our data suggests that if you eat more citrus fruits, it may modestly reduce your risk of stroke.”  (9 seconds)

Cassidy says more research is needed. But she does not recommend supplements, and she says whole fruits are best.

The study in Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association was supported by the National Institutes of Health.

Listen to Tip

You are subscribed to Daily HealthBeat Tip for U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services.

This information has recently been updated, and is now available.

Oranges and strokes

03/29/2012 01:01 AM EDT

 


NIH study finds interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes give good return on investment

March 23, 2012

Programs to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in high-risk adults would result in fewer people developing diabetes and lower health care costs over time, researchers conclude in a new study funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Prevention programs that apply interventions tested in the landmark Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) clinical trial would also improve quality of life for people who would otherwise develop type 2 diabetes. The analysis of costs and outcomes in the DPP and its follow-up study is published in the April 2012 issue of Diabetes Care and online March 22 at http://diabetes.org/diabetescare.

The DPP showed that lifestyle changes (reduced fat and calories in the diet and increased physical activity) leading to modest weight loss reduced the rate of type 2 diabetes in high-risk adults by 58 percent, compared with placebo. Metformin reduced diabetes by 31 percent. These initial results were published in 2002. As researchers monitored participants for seven more years in the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS), they continued to see lower rates of diabetes in the lifestyle and metformin groups compared with placebo (www.nih.gov/news/health/oct2009/niddk-29.htm). Lifestyle changes were especially beneficial for people age 60 and older.

The economic analysis of the DPP/DPPOS found that metformin treatment led to a small savings in health care costs over 10 years, compared with placebo. (At present, metformin, an oral drug used to treat type 2 diabetes, is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for diabetes prevention.) The lifestyle intervention as applied in the study was cost-effective, or justified by the benefits of diabetes prevention and improved health over 10 years, compared with placebo.

“Over 10 years, the lifestyle and metformin interventions resulted in health benefits and reduced the costs of inpatient and outpatient care and prescriptions, compared with placebo. From the perspective of the health care payer, these approaches make economic sense,” said the study’s lead author William H. Herman, M.D., M.P.H., a co-investigator of the DPP Research Group and director of the Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research, Ann Arbor.

The DPP enrolled 3,234 overweight or obese adults with blood sugar levels higher than normal but below the threshold for diabetes diagnosis. Participants were randomly assigned to a lifestyle intervention aimed at a 7 percent weight loss and 150 minutes per week of moderate intensity activity, metformin treatment, or placebo pills. The groups taking metformin or placebo pills also received standard lifestyle recommendations.

“We don’t often see new therapies that are more effective and at the same time less costly than usual care, as was the case with metformin in the DPP. And while the lifestyle intervention was cost-effective, we would see greater savings if the program were implemented in communities,” said Griffin P. Rodgers, M.D., director of the NIH’s National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). “This has already been demonstrated in other NIDDK-funded projects, including one in YMCAs, where a lifestyle-change program cost $300 per person per year in a group setting, compared to about $1,400 for one-on-one attention in the DPP.”

In the DPP, direct costs over 10 years per participant for the lifestyle and metformin interventions were higher than for placebo ($4,601 lifestyle, $2,300 metformin, and $769 placebo). The higher cost of the lifestyle intervention was due largely to the individualized training those participants received in a 16-session curriculum during the DPP and in group sessions during the DPPOS to reinforce behavior changes.

However, the costs of medical care received outside the DPP, for example hospitalizations and outpatient visits, were higher for the placebo group ($27,468) compared with lifestyle ($24,563) or metformin ($25,616). Over 10 years, the combined costs of the interventions and medical care outside the study were lowest for metformin ($27,915) and higher for lifestyle ($29,164) compared with placebo ($28,236). Throughout the study, quality of life as measured by mobility, level of pain, emotional outlook and other indicators was consistently better for the lifestyle group.

“The DPP demonstrated that the diabetes epidemic, with more than 1.9 million new cases per year in the United States, can be curtailed. We now show that these interventions also represent good value for the money,” said study chair David M. Nathan, M.D., director of the Diabetes Research Center at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

In the United States, nearly 26 million people have diabetes, and up to 95 percent of them have type 2 diabetes. About 7 million people have type 2 diabetes but do not know it. In addition, about 79 million adults have prediabetes, with high blood sugar levels that are not yet in the diabetic range. Prediabetes substantially raises the risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Learn more about diabetes at http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov and at www.YourDiabetesInfo.org.

The DPP is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00004992 <http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00004992?term=NCT00004992&rank=1> and the DPPOS as NCT00038727 <http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00038727?term=NCT00038727&rank=1>. The studies were funded by the NIDDK; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Aging; National Eye Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; National Center for Research Resources; and the Office of Research on Women’s Health all part of NIH. Additional funding came from the Indian Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the American Diabetes Association. Bristol-Myers Squibb and Parke-Davis provided funding and material support for the DPP. Lipha (Merck-Sanyo) provided medication, and LifeScan Inc. donated materials.

The NIDDK, a part of the NIH, conducts and supports research on diabetes and other endocrine and metabolic diseases; digestive diseases, nutrition and obesity; and kidney, urologic and hematologic diseases. Spanning the full spectrum of medicine and afflicting people of all ages and ethnic groups, these diseases encompass some of the most common, severe and disabling conditions affecting Americans. For more information about the NIDDK and its programs, see www.niddk.nih.gov.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation’s medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

Laura Oxley
Communication Director
Arizona Department of Health Services


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.